Re: Interview Questions
The emphasis on virtual functions is that I want to make sure they have a
good understanding of OOP. If they don't then I might end up redesigning
alot of their classes. But I guess you are right in a way that they don't
need to know this stuff to write programs but OO is major part of
programming in C++ or C#.
If they are reading this newsgroup, then that is a good thing. Then they are
using this as a tool to learn. (I just posted questions, and not the
answers). You will be surprised that the fact that I emailed these questions
to people how applied and alot of them didn't get the answers right, these
are questions that can be easily googled, and the answer is within the first
2 or 3 links.
Any ideas on questions to gauge a person's problem solving skills?
"Joseph M. Newcomer" <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote in message
On Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:33:56 -0500, "AliR \(VC++ MVP\)"
Do you guys remember the "MFC interview questions" post a few weeks ago?
Well, I'm trying to hire a Jr. programmer to do some C#/Silverlight work
also help out with the C++/MFC stuff. Therefore OOP understanding is the
most important part for me. (The rest can be taught)
What do you guys think of these questions? Can you think of some good
questions to judge a persons problem solving skills?
1. What is polymorphism?
2. What is a virtual function, and how is it used?
This may be a stretch. While I consider this an important piece of
knowledge, I find that
many programmers can program effectively without it, as long as they don't
anything with abstract superclasses.
3. What is a pure virtual function, and why would you use it?
Diito. Good concept, but is it critical for a junior programmer?
4. When and why would you want to have a virtual destructor?
This is three virtual questions in a row, and that may be overkill. If
they miss question
2, they have no hope of answering 3 and 4. If they can answer 2, 3 and 4
5. What is the difference between a pointer and a reference? (In
other words: What must you always do to a reference?)
I'm not convinced this is a critical question. I prefer to use references
possible, and I think Microsoft overuses pointers when references would be
6. What's wrong with the following code sample?
class Super1: public Sub
class Super2 : public Sub
void DoSomething(Super1 *pSuper)
void DoSomething(Super2 *pSuper)
std::vector<Sub *> SubVector;
std::vector<Sub *>::iterator cur = SubVector.begin();
while (cur != SubVector.end())
How would you solve this problem?
It seems pretty obvious. There's at least three issues I see wrong in
that function call
preceding the delete, but are you sure the applicants are not reading this
Questions 2 and 3 are critical to answering it, but this involves, again,
knowing how to
answer 2 & 3.
Joseph M. Newcomer [MVP]
MVP Tips: http://www.flounder.com/mvp_tips.htm