Re: deletion of mem alloated using placement new

whats with the destructor calling? when you delete a pointer the
destructor is automatically called.
also is perfect valid to delete a NULL pointer, so no need to check if
it exists.

also why use malloc/calloc and free? why not new/delete? i cant see a
valid reason in this example to not use the standard c++ allocate/
deallocate operators.
so simple, no need to complicate it:

template <class T>
class Allocator
{
    public:
        static T* Allocate()
        {
            return new T;
        }

        static void Deallocate( T* t )
        {
            delete t;
        }
};

class Test
{
    public:
        Test()
        {
            std::cout << "Test::Test()" << std::endl;
        }

        ~Test()
        {
            std::cout << "Test::~Test()" << std::endl;
        }
};

int main( int argc, char** argv )
{
    Test *t = Allocator<Test>::Allocate();
    Allocator<Test>::Deallocate( t );

    return 0;
}