Re: Practical applications on C++
On Jul 20, 9:03 am, ManicQin <Manic...@gmail.com> wrote:
On Jul 18, 12:50 am, Mirco Wahab <wahab-m...@gmx.de> wrote:
Well I don't want to make you look too far, or at
something you won't have seen. How about Windows?
If you think of Windows 5 (2000/XP), than
that's almost entirely written in C, only
some marginal modules are written in C++.
It's a problem identifying system that were written in C++.
You can use a C++ compiler without using templates\classes.
You can use a C++ compiler without using OO.
So what is considered a "pure" C++ system?
I know that most of the systems in my company are
Hybrids of C++ and C how can you classify them?
As hybrids of C++ and C?
I'm not sure what all this business of "if you don't use X, it's
not C++" is supposed to mean. That <vector> isn't C++, because
it doesn't use polymorphism? C++ provides a very large number
of features, to support many different paradigms. If you don't
use some feature, because some other paradigm is more
appropriate for the problem, you're still using C++.
--
James Kanze (GABI Software) email:james.kanze@gmail.com
Conseils en informatique orient=E9e objet/
Beratung in objektorientierter Datenverarbeitung
9 place S=E9mard, 78210 St.-Cyr-l'=C9cole, France, +33 (0)1 30 23 00 34