Re: Compile time container, run-time execution.
shar3ub@googlemail.com wrote:
you considering for those? It's like asking dead people to dance you
the jig or asking unborn children to smile. Not gonna happen, right?
you considering for those? It's like asking dead people to dance you
the jig or asking unborn children to smile. Not gonna happen, right?
That is what I thought all along. I just wanted to confirm that with
the experts. Thanks guys for your responses and help.
If I knew the input to creating each object, I guess it wouldn't be
too outrageous to parse the files in question, using boost::regex or
something similar, and reconstruct the code itself, adding the objects
to a container and then invoking a certain method on them.
That still doesn't make any sense, generally speaking. Invoking methods
for objects created outside of their context with artificially supplied
parameters will certainly *not* give you the same picture. If your QA
folks insist on doing that, there may be something wrong with their
understanding on how computers work.
V
--
Please remove capital 'A's when replying by e-mail
I do not respond to top-posted replies, please don't ask