Re: unit--, a unit test framework for C++

From:

"Phlip" <phlipcpp@yahoo.com>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.c++

Date:

Fri, 28 Apr 2006 10:01:14 GMT

Message-ID:

<KJl4g.11922$%m4.10118@newssvr33.news.prodigy.com>

VvanN wrote:

testSuite(TemplateSuite)

template <typename T>
void testAlgorithms()
{
   using namespace std;
   using namespace unit_minus;
   vector<T> ve(100, 1);
   partial_sum(ve.begin(), ve.end(), ve.begin());

   assertTrue(ve.size() > 0);
   assertTrue(1 == ve[0]);
   for (unsigned i = 1; i < ve.size(); ++i) {
       assertTrue(ve[i - 1] + 1 < ve[i]);
   }
}

namespace {
testCase(IntCase, TemplateSuite)
{
   testAlgorithms<int>();
}

testCase(UnsignedCase, TemplateSuite)
{
   testAlgorithms<unsigned>();
}

} // namespace
// --- end code ---

Thanks!

One use of AbstractTest is to turn a cases' setUp() and tearDown() into an
abstract factory. setUp() will create a different type, so a common case
body can work across a range of types. Your code doesn't need this effect
because your assertions are not members of the basic TestCase class.

(Assertions are typically macros, so I mean macros are members when they use
member variables inside them.)

--
Phlip
http://c2.com/cgi/wiki?ZeekLand <-- NOT a blog!!!