Re: Don't pass by reference to non-const?

I love it when people comment about things they know nothing
about.

The compiler can't always use RVO. Our two versions were:

std::vector<double> v(...);
for (... lot's of iterations ... )
{
// calculate some values based on the current contents
// of v.
v = some_function(... the calculated values ...);
// ...
}

as opposed to

std::vector<double> v(...);
for (... lot's of iterations ... )
{
// calculate some values based on the current contents
// of v.
some_function(&v, ... the calculated values ...);
// ...
}