Re: object construction recognized as function declaration

Hi @all,

there are always details, why it isn't possible to create a consistent
framework :(
However, here some code:

//--------------

class foo
{
     public:
          foo(){}
};

class fooConst
{
     public:
          explicit fooConst(const foo &p_Foo){}
          void doSomething() {}
};

void test()
{
         fooConst myObject(foo());
         myObject.doSomething(); // <--- Error
}

//--------------

This doen't work on all compilers I have tested, because "fooConst
myObject(foo());" is assumed to be a funtion declaration!

I know that I could write:

foo aFoo;
fooConst myObject(aFoo);

But I don't want to!

Is there another keyword, possibility,........ you can think of ???