Re: Mini-rant on Java REST (JAX-RS), JSON, XML, JAXB etc...
On 3/8/2013 7:44 PM, Arved Sandstrom wrote:
On 03/08/2013 02:06 PM, Leif Roar Moldskred wrote:
On the other
hand, none of the many frameworks that tries to solve the issue have
exactly whelmed me over either.
As I pointed out before, and I don't think I am far wrong, none of the
frameworks has appreciably saved anyone any labour in close to 2
decades. Given - and this is a big given - something like CSS2+, a CGI
script or servlet producing raw XHTML, per page, would be as productive
as the current modern frameworks.
Well - I did a lot of CGI back then - and I think you are
exaggerating here.
I was very hard to work with.
I'm being something of a shit disturber here, but I think I have some
valid points.
I agree on that.
Web frameworks has gotten more and more complex and even though I
do see significant improvements, then they have not delivered as
promised.
1. The J2EE specs assumed right from the beginning that you'd have
multiple stages of people working on beans. What a joke. Same thing.
<quote>
EE.2.11Platform Roles . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . . . . . 19
EE.2.11.1Java EE Product Provider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . 19
EE.2.11.2Application Component Provider . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20
EE.2.11.3Application Assembler . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . 20
EE.2.11.4Deployer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . . 20
EE.2.11.5System Administrator . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . 21
EE.2.11.6Tool Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
.. . . . . . . 21
EE.2.11.7System Component Provider. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 21
</quote>
:-)
Arne