There are a lot of point in using the HTTP protocol because
web servers and browsers support it.
See?
There are a lot of point in using the MySQL protocol, because
MySQL server and client apps support it.
See?
There are no point in a modified HTTP protocol and there are no
point in a modified MySQL protocol, because it will not be able
to talk to anybody.
See? Not only is your grammar as atrocious as usual, but you can't
even come up with a cogent argument. The one you just proffered, if it
were valid, would mean that there was no point in ever again creating
any new protocols for use over TCP/IP. If your argument had been
widely believed a bit more than a decade ago we wouldn't even *have*
HTTP -- "There are [sic] no point in an HTTP protocol because Gopher
is widely supported and ought to be enough for anybody".
Other protocols we might not have if attitudes like yours had
prevailed not too far in the past include SSH, SFTP, and several other
secured versions of/functional replacements for pre-existing
protocols.