Re: Use of the {@code } tag
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009, Lew wrote:
Lew wrote:
rossum wrote:
On Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:17:59 +0100, Tom Anderson <twic@urchin.earth.li>
wrote:
No. But Lew would have more time for other, more positive activities,
which would make him happier, if he didn't put effort into replying. In
the time he's spent responding to Twisted this year, he could have
studied a new API, learned Python, written a PostgreSQL tutorial in
iambic pentameter, learned to juggle, built a covert nanobrewery in his
cubicle, or any one of a number of things.
tom
Yeah, but what does he do in the second week?
PLLPPPTHPTHPTTTHHPPPTTTTHHH!
You have your facts wrong. Look at the number of responses to Twisted's
posts and you'll see I have not that many, especially compared to others
here. Even tom himself has responded to him. I count two from him in the
last week.
I confess that it is true. And yes, there are others who respond more than
you - Arne, i think. But Arne responds to everything, and once in motion,
cannot be stopped, like some kind of programming Juggernaut. I suppose i
was addressing myself to all of us, with Lew as an avatar. If you enjoy
troll-wrestling, go crazy. But don't do it when you'd really rather be
doing something fun.
PostgreSQL:
Among the many databases, some
of which are free, and some quite dear,
with varied levels of support, there's one
that from the rest stands out, the winner clear.
Its syntax is robust, performance, too.
To choose among them you would sure do well
to pick the one that scales, is free, and fast -
that RDBMS, PostgreSQL.
Wonderful!
And now, an Alexandrine about log4j.
tom
--
The Impossible is True