Re: The Closure Controversy
Jon Harrop <usenet@jdh30.plus.com> writes:
something better [than Java ]should be implemented
to replace it in the future.
Java now is the most successful language/platform
(6 million developers, 3.3 billion Java devices)
in the history of computing.
Language implementations with what you ask for (tail call
optimization, type inference, ...) already exist.
So everyone is already free to replace Java by such
an implementation right now.
Many Poeple just have chosen not to use such ?better?
languages and to use Java instead.
So your problem might not be technical but social.
Technically, the ?better language? already is there.
Socially, people choose not to use it often.
If you are sure you know a language that is so much
?better? than Java, and you use it for your own projects,
than you have a strong advantage over all the companies
using Java.
Wouldn't it be a good idea, then, just to use this advantage
to create great products with less effort? Since it gives
you such an edge, why do you want to help your competition
by convincing them to use it too? Actually, you should
keep it secret as long as possible.
If you really want to convince them, the outstanding success
of your projects with this ?better language? should be more
convincing than words and praise could ever be.