Re: fully cancelable
On 12/27/2010 12:02 PM, Jan Burse wrote:
Lew schrieb:
Jan Burse wrote:
BTW you are all talking about spec. What do you mean exactly
by spec? The wording in some Javadoc, or something else?
Go thou and buy the book recommended upthread.
http://www.javaconcurrencyinpractice.com/
There are other sources:
http://www.ibm.com/developerworks/java/library/j-jtp05236.html
Don't delay. Do it now.
Arne Vajh??j wrote:
spec = JLS + JVM spec + Java Doc + various sub spec like JDBC
http://java.sun.com/docs/books/jls/third_edition/html/j3TOC.html
http://download.oracle.com/javase/6/docs/api/java/lang/Thread.html#stop()
You aren't going to master Java concurrency by random ill-considered
questions on Usenet. Do the fundamental research.
I guess you are not in helping mode right now. Instead
What is more helpful than showing the source material for the answers to your
questions?
you decorate your posting with stupid appelations [sic], which
cost you nothing, since you don't do real research for
If by "stupid appellations" you mean the links to that source material, those
are there to help. Of course I do "real research" - that's how I know that
these sources will help you most.
You're acting like a child who wants candy and is angry that all you got was
five dollars and a ride to the candy store.
helping out. Just lists of suggestions, piles of book
references, bla bla, ... So cheap.
I truly am mystified by this response. I cannot imagine what you're here for
if not suggestions, book references, free web-site references, explanations of
how they're relevant with pointers to more information, "bla bla".
All the work I have to do by myself. Interestingly the
You would have to do much less work if you did the suggested reading.
"Measure twice, cut once."
JLS has practically a procedural description of wait(),
which implies the *before or while*. It says(*)
Before step 1:
If thread t is interrupted, an InterruptedException
is thrown and t's interruption status is set to false.
So this matches pretty much the implementations I saw, but
only a few of the Javadocs.
Next time guys, please show a better performance. Otherwise
Ooh, now you're scolding us! I feel sooooo chastised!
I guess you're not in appreciation mode.
I will think this newsgroups is not a hangout were from
time to time experts give a good response, but rather a
hangout for nothing than a*******.
Goodness, me! Aren't you in a bit of a snit! Tch, tch.
I guess you're not exactly a devot?? of Dale Carnegie.
Dude, all the information you got was helpful and given with intent to assist.
The references for further research are very valuable, especially taken in
context of the specific responses also provided. As a group, the newsgroup
has fully answered your questions. You didn't answer many of ours. If you
think insulting all these people who've donated their thought and advice to
your cause will help you, you are mistaken.
Your mean-spirited response is very much out of place.
--
Lew
Ceci n'est pas une pipe.