FireFoc support forums (Re: FF3.6 Stack output from Too Much Recursion)

Hi Stefan,

"Stefan Weiss" <krewecherl@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Cc2dndQJg7yhyRHWnZ2dnUVZ8uednZ2d@giganews.com...

get


following


below


Done, but still no joy I'm afraid :-(

Jorge was good enough to try that (see below for details) but

when the JAVA applet is removed from the equation it all seems to work.

looks like I'll have to try and come up with a scaled-down Applet
reproducer.

this


OK, with HTML5 support appearing I thought I'd clutch at that straw :-)

and

I was dreaming that a setTimeout(x.0); was being optimized to x();

in "x" being executed inline and that might possibly explain the

that I am yet to see! Ridiculous perhaps but I'm running short of

Yes. So: -

function x(){
  setTimeout(x,0); //Along the lines of what I'm doing
}

Does not induce any bloody form of recursion unlike: -

function x(){
  x(); // This will crap out at 3000 (reported stack depth) on FF3.6
}

Which is what I'm *not* doing.

I guess I just wish someone who could read the Mozilla code could tell

what FF3 considers a recursive check/condition (especially given the

property in the Exception that I included earlier) Once again the code

Applet* works fine with only one EmpPicker() selected/instantiated but

another (up to 5) is introduced the "recursion" is trapped at around 153
iterations. The code is also happily chugging away on Chrome as we

Why would multiple concurrent (Jorge's code can not induce the 1.5sec

my server can) timers flag a false recursion flag/exception when a sigle

does not? And why only after 153 successful iterations?


Thanks for your continued interest and advice!

Cheers Richard Maher

Here's Jorge's "working" code (replacing the Applet bits in
Tier3Client.js): -

"Jorge" <jo...@jorgechamorro.com> wrote in message

****FROM HERE****
On Jan 30, 11:01 am, "Richard Maher" <maher...@hotspamnotmail.com>
wrote:
(...)

Removing the applet and the back-and-forth between Java-JS the
resulting java-less version seems to run fine:

http://jorgechamorro.com/cljs/095/

<script type="text/javascript">
  function Tier3Client () {
    (this.chan= {}).rendezvous= function () {
      console.log("this.chan.rendezvous(), "+ (+new Date()));
    };

    this.chan.send= function (msgCandidate, msgBody, async) {
      var r=

u
vwxyz";
      if (async) {
        setTimeout(function () {
          console.log("this.chan.send(async===true)");
          msgCandidate.dispatcher(r, 0, 0);
        }, (2e3*Math.random())|0);
      } else {
        console.log("this.chan.send(async===false)");
        msgCandidate.dispatcher(r, 0, 0);
      }
    };

    this.chan.appendConsoleMsg= function (p) {
      console.log("appendConsoleMsg: "+ p);
    };
  }

  (Tier3Client.prototype = {}).send= function (msgBody, callback,
async) {
    var chan = this.chan;
    var callbackArgs = [];
    var i = 0;
    var msgCandidate = {
      dispatcher : function (responseMsg, msgSlotId, msgSeqNum) {
        callbackArgs[0] = responseMsg;
        callback.apply(this, callbackArgs);
      },
      rendezvous : function () {
        console.log("msgCandidate.rendezvous(), "+ (+new Date()));
        return chan.rendezvous();
      }
    };
    for (i=3; i<arguments.length; i++) {
      callbackArgs[i - 2] = arguments[i];
    }
    return chan.send(msgCandidate, msgBody, async);
  };

  Tier3Client.prototype.appendConsoleMsg= function (msg) {
    console.log("Tier3Client.prototype.appendConsoleMsg(), "+ (+new
Date()));
    this.chan.appendConsoleMsg(msg);
  };
</script>
--
Jorge.

****TO HERE****