Re: Quick n-th Root of BigInteger
On Friday, June 8, 2012 2:47:05 PM UTC-7, Jan Burse wrote:
Lew schrieb:
In any event, this being a Java forum, the notation '=<' (shown nowhere
in your reference link, BTW) is rather odd, as we are used to '<='. Given
that '=<' apparently is not part of the "Set Builder" notation, how about
we stick with the Java (also C, Fortran, C++, C#, Javascript, BASIC, SQL,
Python, shell, ...) idiom?
It was not Java, it was a math spec. When one writes:
Given: xxx
Compute: yyy
Then xxx and yyy are not necessarely needed to follow
the Java language specification.
Do you want me to start counting the trolls that will
now make their appearance in this thread? You are
number 3 so far. I guess there will follow some more...
A troll is not someone who suggests that you be clear in
your communication, but someone who gets personally
abusive as you did when given such a suggestion.
Oh, darn, I forgot. You're the same person who suggests
that one perform a sex act on you when they try to engage
in any technical discussion with you. How do you feel you have
the moral authority to accuse anyone else of being a troll?
Because you don't.
Matthew 7:5.
--
Lew