Re: Test yourself now! (in idle banter)

From:

Leihcim <yourlove@welovespam.nl>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.java.programmer

Date:

Wed, 27 Aug 2008 15:15:08 +0200

Message-ID:

<48b5535c$0$182$e4fe514c@news.xs4all.nl>

/***
   *
      *T*H
         *
         R
         **O*
           *
            W**M
               *
               E
               *!!!
                  *
               ************
          *******///***********
       /*+*/ public ///**********
      /*++*/ class Bomb extends//*-*
    Throwable{public Bomb(){explode//*-_
   ();}public Bomb(String curse){ explode
  ();}private void explode(){for(int $=0; $
  <10;++$){System.out.print("tick.......");
  try{Thread.currentThread().sleep(800);}//
  catch (InterruptedException bombSquad){//
  System.out.println("Defused! Nooooooo!");
  }}System.out.println("BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO"
   +"OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM!!!");
    System.exit(666);}}class Bomber{//123
     public static void main(String[]//4
      args) throws Bomb{new Bomb();}}//
       /***...%#~~~++===%#$~(#)(#$+
           ********************
                **********/

Found this one on a t-shirt once....

Stefan Ram wrote:

  I just made this up as a time filler:

  Can you see anything suspicious in the following
  Java source code without pasting it into an IDE
  or trying to compile it?

  Code starts after this colon:

/*

Every algorithm might use
- any other algorithm (in this sense and also in this class)
- the types int, double, boolean
- type conversions between int and double
- arithmetic operations +-*/%
- boolean-arithmetic operations < > <= >= != ==
- boolean operations & | !
- if, while(), restricted switches, ?:
- all interfaces

An algorithm might not explicitly refer to specific classes,
arrays or other types.

*/

public class algorithm { /* todo */ }