Re: Problem with .jar file
[OT continuation...]
Andrew Thompson wrote:
It seems to be missing from the GG* archive.
I guess from the headers of one of your recent
messages, that you are using GG?
No, I'm not. I'm usually using the news.gazeta.pl, and sometimes
news.task.gda.pl NNTP servers for read/write Usenet access. They are
simply fastest (and feeds most accurately AFAIK) from where I'm living,
and am typically accessing the Usenet (Zielona GVra in Poland). I also
rather rarely use freetext.usenetserver.com for read-only access when I
see that discussion is incomplete. I've never used GG, and if there are
any references to it in my headers, that's most likely because of
referrenig of someone's else posting only (possibly the OP's in the
particular case of this thread).
You can see it here.
<http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forum.aspx/java-programmer/37099/JNLP-xsd-schema#78b1589b35520uwe
I've seen that post before, but now it points to a newer version of the
XSD. It looks nice nice, but I think the Sun shall do that...
I was simply waiting for announcement of it, as promised in your last
post there. :) So now, I know that it exists, and thanks for that! But
for those who are still waiting for it, that's rather good idea to do
the same in the appropriate thread as well. :-)
Note that I had originally credited you for creating
the initial XSD on which I based mine, but now I
look more closely, it seems you simply directed
me to the tool that could do it.
That's what I did. And I think that's worth (if not required) to
mention that tool's name also within the XSD.
(shrugs) Same diff, That initial one I had, was
complete rubbish - your link get me back on track.
Nice to hear that. :-)
* (mutters) Damn them, damn them to hell..
Well, as I said, I have no experience with GG, but I think that there is
no big difference in a way it works compared with a way all other Usenet
servers around the world works. Usenet is based on feeding of a huge
number of messages between servers (a lot of them also), and there is
nothing amazing to me, that some messages arrives in delay, and some
even never.
piotr