Re: How force the java sticky cache ?

daf wrote:
...


My advice is. Don't be 'sorry' be 'smart'*.

There are other (rare) people here who might expect or benefit
from apologies - I do not believe I am one of them.

* By 'smart' I mean - listen carrefully to what people are
asking, and provide the information they ask for.

In this case, you did ..pretty well in supplying both of the
component-desc JNLPs. Now I can confirm to you that ..

"Both JNLP files supplied are valid according to the best
validation document that exists**."

Unfortunately you did not post the 'exact' version of the
*main/original* JNLP, so although I can confirm that the *edited*
version I checked seem vaild, I am not confident that the parts
of the JNLP that were simply '...' are valid, and *that might
make all the difference*. Please post it in a more complete form.
(note that your use of $$codebase etc., do not hinder the basic
type of validation I try to do - that is OK).

** Sun's own JNLP DTD is invalid, but I have developed an
XSD based on that (that hopefully expresses what the DTD
means).

Another part of a 'smart answer' or 'smart reply' it to make sure
each question that is asked - by someone trying to help, is
*answered.*

For example, I asked you..
"Have you told* the cache *not* to store local files?"

A valid 'answer/response' to that might be..
"How do I check that?"
"What do you mean by 'told'? How do I tell it?"
"That is none of your business, and I am not saying"

(The last is likely to produce more sarcasm from me,
or a complete failure on my part to add further
messages at all. But at least it is a reply..)

--
Andrew Thompson
http://www.physci.org/

Message posted via JavaKB.com
http://www.javakb.com/Uwe/Forums.aspx/java-general/200712/1