Hi Alf,
"Alf P. Steinbach" wrote:
Why don't you just provide an ordinary overload for 'char const*'?
I will need overloads for at least:
(char const*)
(char const*, char const*)
(char const*, const int)
(char const*, const double)
(const int, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, char const*)
(char const*, const int, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, char const*, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, const int, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, char const*, char const*, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, char const*, const int, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, const int, char const*, char const*)
(char const*, const int, char const*, char const*, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, char const*, const double, char const*)
(char const*, char const*, const double, char const*, char const*)
PrintError template. Why not just define it in the header and let the
With sufficient thrust, pigs fly just fine. However, this is not
necessarily a good idea. It is hard to be sure where they are going to
overhead. -- RFC 1925