Re: How to work with XML in MFC?
"Daniel James" <wastebasket@nospam.aaisp.org> wrote in message
news:VA.00001631.00e07f6f@nospam.aaisp.org...
MS even does this with the list control. If you go to My Computer
in XP, you will see the different groups such as "Hard Disk Drives",
"Network Drives", etc. in boldface.
That's not what we're talking about at all ... what you write in the
client area of an application's windows is outside the scope of the
design guidelines.
My recollection is that this UI discussion started with the observation that
..NET made it easy to set font on a per-control basis on a form (dialog), and
my comments are related to that.
I am simply extending this concept into my own dialogs where I
put some static controls as boldface.
.. but there your are changing the appearance of something that has a
standard appearance so that your application has a non-standard
appearance. Boldfacing a bit of static text probably won't hurt, but do
you *know* that it won't? Are your dialogs equally accessible to
partially-sighted persons using screen-reader devices, for example?
If it does, then MS has the same problems.
This PC has an Asus motherboard, which came with a little application
called Asusprob that displays a slightly-skinned but recognizably
Windows-like window with tabs that display various information about
the hardware status, software environment, etc.. Useful information,
the window looks a little odd, but I can live with it.
I have another PC with a newer Asus motherboard that came with a newer
version of Asusprob that displays as a hexagonal scarab-like window
that 'telescopes' open horizontally when clicked. There are mystical
symbols of no readily-discernible meaning that one can click on to
change the information displayed. The thing is a disaster. This is the
sort of thing I'm really campaigning against when I say that skinning
is evil.
Well, this is the kind of thing that will sort itself out in the market. It
could be Asus users delight in this kind of thing. I don't, and you don't,
but I'm not getting religion and saying the CUA UI designed for a standard
of 1 font per window is the gold standard for all time either.
Like it or not, web interfaces have done more to influence what a good UI is
than MS or IBM or any other committee could have, and it's time Windows apps
got with the program and be at least as good looking as web apps. If not,
rich client apps will be abandoned even more quickly than they already are!
-- David