RE: TVN_ITEMEXPANDING not firing

From:

=?Utf-8?B?QkpU?= <BJT@discussions.microsoft.com>

Newsgroups:

microsoft.public.vc.language

Date:

Thu, 27 Apr 2006 08:06:02 -0700

Message-ID:

<66AFCB11-1A6E-4D39-978F-A5E9D735EF13@microsoft.com>

I actually found it's sending TVN_ITEMEXPANDINGA.
But why would it do this, if it's a unicode application?
I checked that when it is loaded up WC_TREEVIEW class name that it uses in
CreateWindow is defined as WC_TREEVIEWW and not WC_TREEVIEWA, because UNICODE
is defined.

eh?

"BJT" wrote:

I've got an app in which the TVN_ITEMEXPANDING flag is refusing to be sent.
I'm adding the items like this:
TVINSERTSTRUCT tvis = {0};
tvis.item.iImage = tviteminfo::gServerDisconnectedIconIndex;
tvis.item.iSelectedImage = tviteminfo::gServerDisconnectedIconIndex;
tvis.item.pszText = (LPTSTR)(servername.data());
tvis.item.cChildren = 1;
tvis.item.mask = TVIF_IMAGE | TVIF_SELECTEDIMAGE | TVIF_TEXT | TVIF_CHILDREN
| TVIF_PARAM;
tvis.hInsertAfter = TVI_SORT;
tvis.hParent = TVI_ROOT;
tvis.item.lParam = (LPARAM)(new tviteminfoserver(servername));
tvis.item.hItem = TreeView_InsertItem(mTreeView->mhWnd, &tvis);

and TRYING to receive the WM_NOTIFY / TVN_ITEMEXPANDING combination like this:
LRESULT windowmain::WndProc(HWND hWnd, UINT uMsg, WPARAM wParam, LPARAM
lParam)
{
switch(uMsg)
{
  case WM_NOTIFY:
  {
   LPNMHDR lpnmhdr = (LPNMHDR)lParam;
   if (lpnmhdr->hwndFrom == mTreeView->mhWnd) return TreeViewNotify(lpnmhdr);
...

LRESULT windowmain::TreeViewNotify(LPNMHDR lpnmhdr)
{
//gets to here fine for all other notifications, e.g. NM_RCLICK,
TVN_DELETEITEM.
switch(lpnmhdr->code)
{
  case TVN_ITEMEXPANDING:
  {
  //never gets to here.
   LPNMTREEVIEW lpnmtv = (LPNMTREEVIEW)lpnmhdr;

In case it was due to the TVIS_EXPANDEDONCE flag being set (which the docs
seem to suggest prevents the notification I'm looking for) I tried putting
the line
TreeView_Expand(mTreeView->mhWnd, tvis.item.hItem, TVE_COLLAPSE |
TVE_COLLAPSERESET);
straight after the item was added, but it didn't make any difference - I
didn't think this would be a problem as it only says this takes effect when
the item has been already expanded once, and it hasn't been.

Any ideas?