Re: Passing an address as LPARAM

From:

"Tom Serface" <tom@camaswood.com>

Newsgroups:

microsoft.public.vc.mfc

Date:

Fri, 15 May 2009 08:00:39 -0700

Message-ID:

<58BED2DE-CE25-4FE7-9ECC-BD59609B95BE@microsoft.com>

To add to Scott's reply. If you could use PostMessage it would be better.
Perhaps you address could be for a static variable or one that is a member
of your worker thread class so it doesn't go out of scope after the call is
made?

Tom

<pbruyant@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:db9e468e-1975-4422-a125-61a3a895b2fa@z7g2000vbh.googlegroups.com...

On 14 mai, 22:21, "Victor" <nijegorodov.otp...@freenet.de> wrote:

Not a good approach! It could cause a dead lock.
Read this Joe's essay to learn how to make it a right
way:http://www.flounder.com/workerthreads.htm

Victor

<pbruy...@yahoo.com> wrote in message

news:cafa7cd4-8a59-4a93-8782-280719dc4218@u10g2000vbd.googlegroups.com...

Thank you both of you for sharing your expertise. I am going to use
SendMessage().
And as Scot suggested, I shall make my local variable 'dbl' a member
of my window class that I'll pass to the thread.
Thanks again,
Phil

Thanks for your remark, but could you be more explicit please? Where
could be the deadlock ?
TXS
Phil