Re: Writing good articles that have much better chance to be seen
by others
In article <20091229153000.927@gmail.com>, Kaz Kylheku <kkylheku@gmail.com> wrote:
On 2009-12-25, red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> wrote:
On 12/24/2009 12:05 PM, tanix wrote:
[redacted]
Here's another one.
Avoid ad-hominem attacks against people who have professional
reputations you could only dream about having. People such as
Pete Becker.
Argumento ad hominem does not refer to disagreeing with someone in a rude way.
One perfect example of ad hominem would be something like ``whatever P___ B___
writes is holy scripture because of /who/ he is and his professional
reputation, not because of what is actually written''.
I see this "ad hominem" template used quite often.
And every single time I remeber seeing it,
it was made by people with perverted minds, distorting things
and attacking someone, blaming him for attacking them.
This is simply a template, used by people with perverted minds,
whose brain capacity does not allow them to find the real solution
or face reality.
--
Programmer's Goldmine collections:
http://preciseinfo.org
Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on
C++, MFC, VC, ATL, STL, templates, Java, Python, Javascript,
organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques.