Re: Problem with linker
On Wed, 13 Jun 2007 15:57:02 GMT, MrAsm <mrasm@usa.com> wrote:
IMHO, you are kind of "misrepresenting" David...
If I have, I will owe him an apology, but I don't see where I've done that.
Since you bring it up, in David's latest reply to me, I could demonstrate
where he misrepresented what I've said and how I entered this thread, and
even misrepresented what he himself said. But he needs to have the last
word, so I will let him, as I have before.
Since I've been reading messages in this newsgroup, I have never found
any offending or unpleasant message by David.
David likes to talk about language design, but when informed how things are
actually defined, or why they work the way they do, and when asked to
clarify or expand on something he's said, he has responded by
characterizing others as "losing the forest for the trees", suffering from
a "stuck in the mud mindset", etc, while characterizing himself as "having
different goals and values for our lives" and being representative of
"Windows programmers" that have to "plan accordingly" due to the "attitude"
of people who create "monstrosities", but he's "enlightened" to have
learned "how they actually think". David will complain he doesn't "have
time" to argue any of this, yet he posts endlessly in this vein. For me,
this is interesting up to a point, but it's entered "fool me twice"
territory now.
--
Doug Harrison
Visual C++ MVP