Um, OK, but I was trying to stick up for you. Sorry if you didn't get that
In article <0491A112-E7FD-4AC8-BA52-ECFED0433592@microsoft.com>, "Tom
Serface" <tom@nospam.camaswood.com> wrote:
I think it's fair for people to promote their site here if it's not over
done.
Well, even if it is "ovedone", the only outcome is the AUTHOR
is going to suffer consequences.
Otherwise, no one is forcing anyone to read ANY articles.
This is the most basic law of Usenet, and I know about
Usenet more than most of you combined.
For example, Joe will often let us know when he's written a new
article and I'm always happy to go read them. I think the thread got
longer
from people complaining about the advert than it was with the advert. If
it
has to do with MFC a simple update notice here is quite appropriate imo.
Well, tell you one thing: I know what is "appropriate"
better than most of you around here. First of all, I happen
to be one of top level experts. Worked down to kernel level
on quite a few projects for the biggest players in the world.
So...
We don't have problem in THAT department.
Secondly, I know exactly what I am doing.
If some of you don't like it, tough.
They don't even have to bother reading these threads.
Doesn't matter to me even a single iota.
Tom