Re: Threading in new C++ standard

From:

Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com>

Newsgroups:

comp.lang.c++,comp.soft-sys.ace

Date:

Thu, 22 May 2008 12:49:58 -0400

Message-ID:

<2008052212495816807-pete@versatilecodingcom>

On 2008-05-22 12:32:05 -0400, Szabolcs Ferenczi
<szabolcs.ferenczi@gmail.com> said:

On May 1, 8:07??am, Owen Jacobson <angrybald...@gmail.com> wrote:

On Apr 25, 5:04??pm, Szabolcs Ferenczi <szabolcs.feren...@gmail.com>
wrote:

On Apr 25, 11:57??am, James Kanze <james.ka...@gmail.com> wrote:

...
No. ??Several people have pointed out several times where the
language addresses concurrency issues.

Oh yes, you are one of them who continously keep saying that C++0x
adresses concurrency issues at the language level but who fail to put
here just a single language element for it.

If the only "language element" your world-view will admit is a new
syntactic construct, then you're right and the new C++ standard does
not contain any language elements to support threading.

It is at least honest of you to admit that "the new C++ standard does
not contain any language elements to support threading."

Good for you! You've actually retained the words that you're responding
to, making it easy for anyone reading your message to see that you've
misrepresented what they say.

--
Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)