Re: Q: Free compiler for 64 bit Windows 7?
In article <RKKdnft88JlPiazWnZ2dnUVZ_sti4p2d@giganews.com>, Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
tanix wrote:
In article <Re2dncsqjrDaXa3WnZ2dnUVZ_tZi4p2d@giganews.com>, Pete Becker
<pete@versatilecoding.com> wrote:
arunix wrote:
What about asking in a Windoze newsgroup?
Because its gcc based compiler.
Oh, of course: a gcc based compiler for Windows isn't a Windows compiler.
Sigh. gcc is just as off-topic as Windows.
What is this "off-topic" bullshit?
Have you heard of cygwin?
Yes, I'm familiar with cygwin. It's just as off-topic in this newsgroup
as "gcc" and "Windows compilers".
You don't OWN this group
and it is not your private kitchen.
And you are not an authorised controller of the global information
streams, no matter how big of a fart you think you are.
I just hope that people with your mentality can really offers
some contribution to the language without creating the totally
perverted verions of all sorts of mechanism, just because of their
sadistic tendencies.
It is a pitty people like you are involved in language design
and definitions. You look like a power hungry politician to me.
I doubt you can contribute to the language anything of real power,
beauty or flexibility it so badly needs, at least from now on.
Because its days are numbered in more cases than not.
--
Programmer's Goldmine collections:
http://preciseinfo.org
Tens of thousands of code examples and expert discussions on
C++, MFC, VC, ATL, STL, templates, Java, Python, Javascript,
organized by major topics of language, tools, methods, techniques.